“Ontology
Engineering: A Survey and a Return on Experience” by Fabien,
Gandon
Paper Review Form
A. Reader Interest
1. Which category describes this manuscript?
___Practice/Application/Case
Study/Experience Report
___Research/Technology
_x_Survey/Tutorial/How-To
B. Content
1. Please explain how this manuscript advances
this field of research and/or contributes something new to the literature.
1.
Is the manuscript technically sound?
_x_Yes
___Appears
to be - but didn't check completely
___Partially
___No
C. Presentation
1. Are the title, abstract, and keywords
appropriate?
_x_Yes
___No
1.
Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate
references?
_x_References are sufficient and appropriate
___Important
references are missing; more references are needed
___Number
of references are excessive
2.
Does the introduction state the objectives of the
manuscript in terms that encourage the reader to read on?
_x_Yes
___Could
be improved
___No
4. How would you rate the organization of the
manuscript? Is it focused? Is the length
appropriate for the topic?
_x_Satisfactory
___Could
be improved
___Poor
5. Please rate and comment on the readability of
this manuscript.
___Easy
to read
_x_Readable - but requires some effort to understand
___Difficult
to read and understand
___Unreadable
Section II. Evaluation
Please
rate the manuscript. Explain your choice.
___Award
Quality
___Excellent
_x_Good
___Fair
___Poor
Section III. Detailed Comments
This paper explains need for the
ontology. And it shows the ways to create the ontologies.
the paper show how useful and necessary ontologies are.
This paper makes the ways of
creating ontologies ,which are hard to understand, easy by illustrating with
some examples.